Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

In-ceram ÄÚ¾ÆÀÇ Ç¥¸éó¸® ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ·¹Áø ½Ã¸àÆ®¿ÍÀÇ °áÇÕ°­µµ ¹× Ç¥¸é»óÅ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

Study on the surface morphologe and shear bond strength of In-Ceram core to resin cement after varing modes of surface conditioning

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 1995³â 33±Ç 4È£ p.693 ~ 704
±è¿µ¼÷, ¿ìÀÌÇü, ÀÓÈ£³², Ãֺκ´,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¿µ¼÷ ( Kim Yeung-Sug ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¿ìÀÌÇü ( Woo Yi-Hyung ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀÓÈ£³² ( Lim Ho-Nam ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Ãֺκ´ ( Choi Boo-Byung ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


This study was performed to evaluate effective surface conditioning method of In-Ceram core to improve bonding with resin cement. The surface of each sample was abraded with glass bead for 20 seconds and then subjected to one of the following conditions : no modification, sandblasting with 50§­ alumimum oxide powders for 20 seconds, etching with 20% hydrofluoric acid for 5, 10, and 15 minum (half of the etched samples were coated with silane), and sandblasting with 250§­ aluminum oxide powders and silica coating with Silicoater MD system(Kulzer, Germany). The surface morphology changes were examined with scanning electronic microscope(SEM) and the shear bond strength of In-Ceram core samples to resin cement(Panavia 21, Kurayay, Japan) were measured. @ES It was concluded that: @EN 1. By SEM observation, 20% HF acid etching did not create clear microretentive structure and surface roughness diminished with increace in etching time. Sandblasting was more effective than 20% hydrofluoric acid etching in producing microretentive structure. 2. The bond strengths of all In-Ceram core samples surface conditioned were increased than that of control group. 3. Silica coating showed higher bond strength than etching with 20% hydrofluoric acid. 4. The use of silane coating was more effective in improving bond strength than lengthening etching time.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed